{"id":"W2171964586","doi":"10.1109/tap.2011.2165487","title":"A Multiplicative Regularized Gauss–Newton Inversion for Shape and Location Reconstruction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation","topic":"Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Multiplicative function; Homogeneous; A priori and a posteriori; Regularization (linguistics); Gauss; Inversion (geology); Algorithm; Mathematics; Inverse problem; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001144931,0.0001189317,0.0001192872,0.0001526943,0.0001600044,0.00002921776,0.00002903593,0.00006629029,0.00001739665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004740008,0.000115392,0.00003398572,0.0001717899,0.00005954176,0.0001720527,5.024694e-7,0.00009244587,0.000004129809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003030485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006976159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004110404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002224419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994529,0.00002209439,0.0001608717,0.0002008852,0.00005230147,0.0001109363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996879,0.00002406496,0.00003812998,0.0001074519,0.00009070543,0.00005173017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002014607,0.00005567943,0.0001056724,0.0002470152,0.000122948,5.436993e-7,0.00237088,0.0007915327,0.5267513,0.00005352377,0.0001050964,0.4691943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006201353,0.00009522885,0.0007992015,0.0001062048,0.00009077021,0.0000229386,0.0002785771,0.8149261,0.1825546,0.0002264759,0.00009487228,0.0001849588],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3053392,0.00006299753,0.6938863,0.0001324819,0.0001319163,0.0002372007,0.000009822984,0.0001316751,0.0000683807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951788,0.0002627042,0.00429427,0.00003143715,0.00001728596,0.00006076452,0.000008044842,0.00001784793,0.0001288908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4705551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02141856898056681,"score_gpt":0.2066162749193888,"score_spread":0.185197705938822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}