{"id":"W2171967462","doi":"10.5194/acp-10-12161-2010","title":"Evidence for the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol to protect the ozone layer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric chemistry and physics","topic":"Atmospheric Ozone and Climate","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Antarctic Survey; European Commission; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Ozone; Ozone layer; Proxy (statistics); Environmental science; Atmospheric sciences; Linear model; Term (time); Stratosphere; Ozone depletion; Linear regression; Volcano; Climatology; Meteorology; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005019525,0.0001385066,0.0001391275,2.919338e-8,0.0003346686,0.00004212651,0.0003991353,0.00005313298,0.0003364986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001158494,0.00006010152,0.00008627222,0.0002109627,0.0001870838,0.0000751751,0.00003210234,0.00020252,0.00000676531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002162765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005744789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001135807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000166133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992417,0.00005985958,0.0001344664,0.0002019077,0.0001656044,0.0001964714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982029,0.001197437,0.00008430204,0.0004124904,0.00005321064,0.00004961056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001522424,0.00009327743,0.1331858,0.001079516,0.0001288159,0.000001168108,0.0006489946,0.007333357,0.04269344,0.0001141689,0.00051335,0.8126857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009986007,0.0002410635,0.8603878,0.0002572768,0.000133527,0.000018192,0.0002457696,0.04226558,0.07702826,0.00433559,0.01367589,0.0004124229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693662,0.00009077653,0.001667612,0.0003952877,0.0001132593,0.0255444,0.00002442225,0.00002125148,0.002776816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925807,0.000007231545,0.001195944,0.0001166853,0.0002457114,0.005290599,0.000001885383,0.000006070674,0.0005551746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8122732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3684424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01787197499169336,"score_gpt":0.2580576070765244,"score_spread":0.2401856320848311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}