{"id":"W2171973322","doi":"10.1002/hec.2869","title":"TWO‐LEVEL RESAMPLING AS A NOVEL METHOD FOR THE CALCULATION OF THE EXPECTED VALUE OF SAMPLE INFORMATION IN ECONOMIC TRIALS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"","keywords":"Resampling; Nonparametric statistics; Sample (material); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Randomized controlled trial; Econometrics; Range (aeronautics); Population; Value of information; Statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Medicine; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00634439,0.0001309282,0.0006237965,0.0001602697,0.0001153175,0.00001884955,0.0002138213,0.00008873627,0.00007633752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000544178,0.0001164306,0.0002033996,0.00006968494,0.00004633745,0.0005589246,0.0000613224,0.00009404892,0.00003170591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006789807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001236626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00692695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000310951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973016,0.00006193315,0.002162251,0.0001695401,0.00001898637,0.0002857027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959922,0.001302875,0.002275038,0.0003627596,0.00001094465,0.000056163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001020507,0.0001142166,0.1754027,0.0001118101,0.00008659617,1.191602e-9,0.003979058,0.2271672,0.00002139518,0.5876112,0.0001307643,0.005272968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004502003,0.0001271386,0.5721408,0.00004447288,0.00003009802,0.000003699317,0.001262657,0.3780415,0.0008640125,0.02933945,0.01328531,0.0003589428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8185751,0.0006566993,0.1752371,0.001262508,0.001007039,0.001653881,0.001202645,0.000007564357,0.0003974538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703387,0.0003131519,0.02825749,0.000692458,0.0001352959,0.0001383833,0.00008527653,0.00001929091,0.00001995574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5582718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3705748915025587,"score_gpt":0.3717277638664587,"score_spread":0.001152872363900048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}