{"id":"W2172050731","doi":"10.1007/s12239-012-0015-6","title":"Design analysis and comparison between standard and rotary porting systems for IC engine","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Automotive Technology","topic":"Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Porting; Rotary engine; Reciprocating motion; Internal combustion engine; Engineering; Torque; Automotive engineering; Software; Mechanical engineering; Piston (optics); Valve timing; Computer Aided Design; Systems design; Control engineering; Computer science; Systems engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004251721,0.0001457627,0.0004655016,0.00111397,0.0000331532,0.00001868198,0.000272408,0.0001704494,0.000004801168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008569269,0.0001333074,0.00006708207,0.0003513842,0.0001018119,0.0002381603,0.0001119641,0.0003468567,5.326362e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000146526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001358584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002067114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.832396e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988596,0.0000161016,0.0005562808,0.000126294,0.0002149385,0.0002267491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985268,0.0003568826,0.0004683419,0.00009722989,0.0004890691,0.00006174005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003140947,0.0001915067,0.4796699,0.0001123165,0.01064199,0.00005197709,0.0007185575,0.3113888,0.02161001,0.01671549,0.0003067806,0.1582786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006980075,0.001966266,0.06661756,0.0006188357,0.003472734,0.001160888,0.004771731,0.4904175,0.4002857,0.01636782,0.005734127,0.001606785],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.239349,0.001646559,0.7579312,0.0006150015,0.0001654114,0.00009437321,0.00001601999,0.0001746102,0.000007824893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92737,0.00008455558,0.07237311,0.000006725883,0.0001251103,0.000009500571,0.000004500195,0.00001564875,0.00001081423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6880211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5436119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02446067014569099,"score_gpt":0.3145109184183815,"score_spread":0.2900502482726905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}