{"id":"W2172203360","doi":"10.1111/jrir.12005","title":"The predictive relations between non‐alphanumeric rapid naming and growth in regular and irregular word decoding in at‐risk readers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Psychological Association; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Alphanumeric; Decoding methods; Psychology; Word (group theory); Reading (process); Phonology; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Speech recognition; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008162688,0.0001394495,0.0003243249,0.001442352,0.0003062962,0.0001481886,0.0002371378,0.0001346809,0.0000268999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008432452,0.0001063841,0.00003863189,0.001010116,0.0002506958,0.0004325644,0.0001330313,0.001336266,0.000008596498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004944404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007695836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007485794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005190224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968024,0.001017253,0.0007886332,0.0002801123,0.0004742542,0.0006373077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996064,0.003163863,0.000279035,0.0001720409,0.0001401354,0.0001809202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001022036,0.00002575637,0.9221529,0.00002248617,0.00005880116,0.0001038027,0.01690212,0.00001826394,0.0001363686,0.0001415904,0.0005286913,0.05980696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001139569,0.0001464206,0.9824216,0.0009719601,0.000008067648,0.00009129681,0.009396386,0.0008310085,0.00007536434,0.004319517,0.0004812078,0.0001175393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937841,0.00239645,0.0002159113,0.001549878,0.00013012,0.0003624994,0.000001457956,0.000005304856,0.001554296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958991,0.001304339,0.002013694,0.000009515766,0.0001002385,0.0000425923,0.000001257806,0.00002040837,0.0006088529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0602687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5805484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04141064136863804,"score_gpt":0.3619917654731853,"score_spread":0.3205811241045473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}