{"id":"W2172241235","doi":"10.1109/tmech.2010.2052366","title":"An Analytical Generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model Inversion for Hysteresis Compensation in Micropositioning Control","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics","topic":"Piezoelectric Actuators and Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":425,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"University of Waterloo; Michigan State University","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Actuator; SMA*; Inverse; Feed forward; Hysteresis; Magnetostriction; Prandtl number; Mathematics; Computer science; Physics; Engineering; Control engineering; Mechanics; Algorithm; Control (management); Convection; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000376546,0.0005981461,0.0005428499,0.0002995743,0.0002398668,0.0005103185,0.0009108481,0.0006944305,0.001113818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006578853,0.0002556323,0.0006145343,0.0002203684,0.0004809177,0.0007918585,0.0004650162,0.0008545012,0.0002902981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004321383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007177216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002228875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002146463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999772,0.00004217793,0.00001169192,0.00003918958,0.0001110809,0.0000238623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998511,0.00003989329,0.00002525498,0.00002247168,0.00005532,0.000005918271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007541687,0.00006684688,0.0005123449,0.0002971875,0.00004287668,0.0002814791,0.0003239526,0.7956,0.07719371,0.06581602,0.001041423,0.05874873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003253008,0.00002623431,0.00005041897,0.000004609386,0.000003945901,0.00002188815,0.000006910341,0.9951429,0.001724346,0.002182353,0.0008272757,0.00000586896],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01177811,0.0002456626,0.9841974,0.00008556866,0.00004121718,0.00003071208,0.0000215235,0.0002204088,0.003379362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8590236,0.0005422939,0.1337254,0.0001117549,0.00005173008,0.0001747728,0.000106234,0.00008700044,0.006177194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002228875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004431784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009015625051385336,"score_gpt":0.2334202670791281,"score_spread":0.2244046420277427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}