{"id":"W2172299621","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2011.041","title":"An evaluation of MBR and conventional pretreatment for reverse osmosis for water reclamation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Effluent; Reverse osmosis; Turbidity; Membrane bioreactor; Filtration (mathematics); Environmental science; Wastewater; Fouling; Land reclamation; Rotating biological contactor; Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Membrane fouling; Pulp and paper industry; Membrane; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006314929,0.0005372697,0.0004782936,0.0003107219,0.0001882194,0.0004064727,0.0003715,0.0004905183,0.000745702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001212633,0.0001829677,0.0003308601,0.0002330592,0.0002670371,0.0004291951,0.0002323002,0.0003377392,0.0002569283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003255581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003773826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001173513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002009868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991863,0.0001972671,0.00005536394,0.0001097603,0.0003803039,0.00007092633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995443,0.0001296804,0.0001409847,0.00004795472,0.00008724034,0.00004980523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003978516,0.0001894446,0.0005638865,0.0001737782,0.00002356785,0.00004456102,0.00002267055,0.0002704332,0.991243,0.00003679163,0.00002825155,0.007005842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008484037,0.008008066,0.01005661,0.00001127925,0.00009454885,0.0003412258,0.00004293158,0.00178411,0.9774591,0.00002238611,0.002074069,0.00002080261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946418,0.001321044,0.003457735,0.00005970579,0.00002935608,0.0000518956,0.00004517562,0.00005034986,0.0003429021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899783,0.001122702,0.007846245,0.00004061498,0.00001956574,0.00002828871,0.000156843,0.00002075707,0.0007867243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001173513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003339708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05702864732843039,"score_gpt":0.2789305742333296,"score_spread":0.2219019269048992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}