{"id":"W2172869491","doi":"10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[74:qdoshi]2.0.co;2","title":"Quantifying Densities of Snowshoe Hares in Maine Using Pellet Plots","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Council for Air and Stream Improvement","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Taiga; Pellet; Boreal; Range (aeronautics); Wildlife; Ecology; Population density; Population; Environmental science; Wildlife management; Geography; Deciduous; Biology; Forestry; Predation; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004304301,0.0001468045,0.0002172433,0.00002375598,0.0001502199,0.00001419952,0.0001521018,0.0001492134,0.001630224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004177536,0.0001553257,0.0001265546,0.0002178893,0.00031948,0.0000772771,0.000130163,0.0001632577,0.0001897042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001362907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002142896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002626888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005814459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987362,0.00008582363,0.0003654007,0.0002723634,0.0002284132,0.0003117789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995087,0.0001225147,0.0001501585,0.0001731466,0.00001270755,0.00003278241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001544953,0.00008533993,0.8957357,0.00001851607,0.000008818264,0.00000495866,0.0004885494,0.006567371,0.001660933,0.0001656904,0.0951964,0.00005227432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006080501,0.00003110374,0.966849,0.00005598591,0.00001861546,0.000009641316,0.001144948,0.006329478,0.0003604421,0.0002803346,0.02406065,0.0002517551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941097,0.0000723285,0.0003116291,0.004164478,0.00009355583,0.0001487308,0.000006512031,0.00003558275,0.001057405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903185,0.00002063817,0.006259031,0.002637733,0.00007832969,0.000008105539,0.00001432071,0.00001776327,0.0006455458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07113574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0211844637283064,"score_gpt":0.2334698141391828,"score_spread":0.2122853504108764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}