{"id":"W2172944690","doi":"10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<1617:stoetu>2.0.co;2","title":"Sensitivity Testing of Extratropical Transitions Using Potential Vorticity Inversions to Modify Initial Conditions: Hurricane Earl Case Study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Monthly Weather Review","topic":"Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Extratropical cyclone; Potential vorticity; Mesoscale meteorology; Climatology; Anomaly (physics); Environmental science; Trough (economics); Storm; Meteorology; Sensitivity (control systems); Vorticity; Geology; Vortex; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002787014,0.0002023726,0.0004959917,0.00009255309,0.0003520408,0.00003868889,0.0001408474,0.0000668546,0.001495164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002350223,0.0001615374,0.0001682384,0.0007982624,0.0001514702,0.0001812456,0.00003062254,0.0003037412,0.00009265933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000137517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000747728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03292325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01581285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975807,0.000619812,0.0005241088,0.0003822957,0.0004552339,0.0004378713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988515,0.0002174322,0.00007750852,0.0002895985,0.000154062,0.0004098711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001414788,0.001227609,0.8989174,0.0005898203,0.00014005,0.020658,0.000427247,0.01142707,0.001133938,0.00003651,0.0002259573,0.06507491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00135678,0.002085542,0.9467605,0.001348377,0.0006765466,0.004251751,0.001329408,0.0393634,0.00004126564,0.0003039461,0.001674581,0.0008078465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936044,0.002688027,0.001396479,0.0006335261,0.00007210634,0.000972885,0.0002157701,0.00004488419,0.0003719314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976228,0.0002006342,0.001638322,0.0003599082,0.0001266352,0.000008435945,0.00002440995,0.000007171132,0.00001165751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06426706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09262625991796854,"score_gpt":0.3377748832754077,"score_spread":0.2451486233574392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}