{"id":"W2173474217","doi":"10.1504/ijamc.2009.026862","title":"Comparative analysis of tactile sensitivity between blind, deaf and unimpaired people","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Advanced Media and Communication","topic":"Tactile and Sensory Interactions","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Visually impaired; Audiology; Hearing impaired; Computer science; Sensitivity (control systems); Deaf blind; Speech recognition; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Human–computer interaction; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000987481,0.0002527565,0.0004252979,0.002598463,0.000324572,0.0005278166,0.0001911608,0.0002921043,0.003717994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005736183,0.0001477593,0.0003044736,0.0005100476,0.0004122187,0.0005013049,0.0008545259,0.0001803211,0.0004905763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001853326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007590801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00111359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992624,0.0001247405,0.0001013197,0.0001808685,0.0002273067,0.0001033684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979254,0.001122631,0.0001658777,0.000117922,0.0004166969,0.0002514309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00490842,0.0003173782,0.6493051,0.0006799977,0.0004470563,0.002120337,0.01410881,0.0005611563,0.1740066,0.001069457,0.0007224883,0.1517532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002139055,0.0008686977,0.980655,0.00002622235,0.00009807557,0.003530637,0.003127173,0.0005503616,0.0097256,0.0006090334,0.0007501097,0.00003762381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975476,0.0001297439,0.001040821,0.000007943238,0.00000646657,0.00001259316,0.0001181893,0.00001286971,0.001123863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987218,0.00005931309,0.0006955597,0.00001462201,0.000006689945,0.00001563766,0.00009329381,0.000005977996,0.0003871081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003717994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01243794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04654419350387965,"score_gpt":0.3527307137966191,"score_spread":0.3061865202927395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}