{"id":"W2173723867","doi":"10.1139/x11-071","title":"Comparison of different methods for fitting nonlinear mixed forest models and for making predictions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Maximum likelihood; Restricted maximum likelihood; Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Nonlinear system; Statistics; Marginal likelihood; Mixed model; Applied mathematics; Gaussian; Estimation theory; Econometrics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002038845,0.00009426556,0.0002486378,0.000274494,0.0003861615,0.00002376472,0.0003259249,0.00008542111,0.0001115519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004218853,0.0000804063,0.00009215849,0.0001461396,0.0004473267,0.0001758561,0.00007824137,0.000241369,0.000001319821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001726375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001162446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001477075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1488836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986487,0.0001239739,0.0004126454,0.0001580792,0.0001666703,0.0004899411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998792,0.0004293055,0.0001760351,0.0001481688,0.0001143151,0.0003401725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000203885,0.0001482676,0.9266503,0.0001347036,0.0001092561,0.000008442586,0.002742657,0.009207665,0.00008122029,0.03860207,0.005635711,0.01647585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001140416,0.001970243,0.6312723,0.000135884,0.00008133532,0.0000207713,0.001298157,0.1996149,0.0006003416,0.1569879,0.006700559,0.0001771875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7067724,0.0001847242,0.2895906,0.00024179,0.0002596394,0.000786985,0.00002713471,0.00000369652,0.002133083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148159,0.000009417026,0.08490736,0.00001493297,0.00004906984,0.00004434118,0.000003324722,0.00001359661,0.0001420791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.295378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.866647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2072054738966506,"score_gpt":0.4315442894190332,"score_spread":0.2243388155223825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}