{"id":"W2173723867","doi":"10.1139/x11-071","title":"Comparison of different methods for fitting nonlinear mixed forest models and for making predictions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Maximum likelihood; Restricted maximum likelihood; Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Nonlinear system; Statistics; Marginal likelihood; Mixed model; Applied mathematics; Gaussian; Estimation theory; Econometrics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01313779,0.001571963,0.001141044,0.002562841,0.0005880556,0.001174979,0.002457329,0.00141244,0.00152048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04121113,0.0008560711,0.002035576,0.00165579,0.0005760583,0.002201075,0.001612422,0.001771925,0.000543408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001117243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001673619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01048904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946242,0.003632967,0.0003157028,0.000457053,0.0008524712,0.0001174431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764996,0.01976014,0.000821331,0.001011272,0.001720953,0.0001866301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009985319,0.0003607494,0.01425288,0.001203293,0.001406108,0.0001687754,0.0009383002,0.5253358,0.005026027,0.01320676,0.0017548,0.4353479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006742304,0.0001262816,0.00333087,0.000109689,0.000149861,0.0001050745,0.00012309,0.9850552,0.002524683,0.006922101,0.001383455,0.0001022935],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03171484,0.0009874493,0.9654647,0.0001472377,0.00004027316,0.0001424012,0.0001624983,0.0006519011,0.0006887888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1519942,0.001062472,0.8442152,0.00007553334,0.00003565289,0.0006593059,0.0006510732,0.0004796948,0.0008268803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06948012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2072054738966506,"score_gpt":0.4315442894190332,"score_spread":0.2243388155223825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}