{"id":"W2173730649","doi":"10.2495/dne-v8-n2-165-171","title":"The force cone method: a new thinking tool for lightweight structures","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cone (formal languages); Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Structural engineering; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005567286,0.0001123662,0.0001240029,0.0001023181,0.0000944971,0.000353009,0.0003030477,0.0001313169,0.00004431628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002715211,0.00007600215,0.00007361447,0.00005817891,0.00001406072,0.0004914931,0.00001554195,0.0004329207,0.000003454512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006038284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000801113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003733702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005108091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992004,0.00004566667,0.0003114638,0.00007245676,0.0002389854,0.0001310357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998065,0.001244824,0.0001788788,0.00007644429,0.0003638447,0.00007101834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007956935,0.00006988801,0.0001847119,0.00007158564,0.002692909,0.00003294931,0.003751956,0.04177769,0.01310445,0.2541143,0.2268829,0.456521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001598765,0.0002068796,0.001408235,0.00009899194,0.00014797,0.00116266,0.000423892,0.2445375,0.00289496,0.5131737,0.2339331,0.0004133329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004788525,0.003013373,0.98339,0.004560011,0.00338504,0.0002303294,0.000005034564,0.00002555632,0.0006020758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5767881,0.00225322,0.4147136,0.001827493,0.002037159,0.0000161634,0.00001113491,0.00005653885,0.002296522],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5719996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3404073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01152333021702971,"score_gpt":0.2867556715693455,"score_spread":0.2752323413523158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}