{"id":"W2173914137","doi":"10.21991/c95q2h","title":"A COURT IN NEED AND A FRIEND INDEED: AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE AMICUS CURIAE IN THE QUEBEC SECESSION REFERENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Secession; Political science; Referendum; Principle of legality; Sovereignty; Politics; Majority opinion; Advisory opinion; Government (linguistics); Dissenting opinion; Sociology; International law; International court; Public international law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007923066,0.0001202419,0.0002512434,0.000575554,0.001175828,0.0000674796,0.0006516093,0.0001469705,0.0001488172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002848941,0.00008388887,0.0001350385,0.001582474,0.01036159,0.0004552113,0.0001169423,0.0002593684,0.000002445368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005568377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002908305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5245767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9690104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981782,0.0003125615,0.0004426169,0.00024426,0.0005103648,0.0003120303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990757,0.00009820764,0.0002669222,0.0003495254,0.0001324632,0.0000771833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002245484,0.0001057193,0.1832401,0.000005967085,0.00003762309,0.000001974444,0.005247503,0.00008287608,0.00005108061,0.8108603,0.0001766981,0.0001677897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001602725,0.00004610083,0.8096901,0.0003784811,0.0004700919,0.00001543541,0.08918213,0.0005766104,0.00007426696,0.02771388,0.06982643,0.0004237851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440396,0.00041588,0.0003210022,0.002834993,0.0007023175,0.0006881814,0.0003176962,0.00001330981,0.05066705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994203,0.00004904349,0.00003017513,0.0002634077,0.0000150994,0.0000247402,0.00001154967,0.00000211213,0.0001835572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7831464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02473364440888928,"score_gpt":0.253101599269096,"score_spread":0.2283679548602067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}