{"id":"W2174135902","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.027","title":"Sensitivity subgroup analysis based on single-center vs. multi-center trial status when interpreting meta-analyses pooled estimates: the logical way forward","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Confidence interval; Odds ratio; Medicine; Random effects model; Randomized controlled trial; Single Center; Subgroup analysis; Pooled variance; Strictly standardized mean difference; Clinical trial; Center (category theory); Statistics; Meta-regression; Mean difference; Coverage probability; Internal medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3067865,0.006245975,0.03160078,0.006917753,0.001368338,0.01002199,0.006028874,0.006074076,0.006856728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5331432,0.003228827,0.05001153,0.007003053,0.002307187,0.009174082,0.004607415,0.01345784,0.000994477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002742209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006626511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004271726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007478708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5342289,0.3734455,0.06300474,0.0140603,0.01387221,0.001388395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4703145,0.4704491,0.0164603,0.03493841,0.006615034,0.001222546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01398696,0.0001305256,0.0111944,0.06945053,0.7950499,0.0007185612,0.001422359,0.004711718,0.001349347,0.008449591,0.0102785,0.0832576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01269478,0.002025022,0.009089495,0.02257079,0.7826639,0.001167477,0.0006407883,0.02225906,0.002577719,0.121872,0.02166395,0.0007749451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02509796,0.3022298,0.6151188,0.01319928,0.0206624,0.01039838,0.008085787,0.001583251,0.003624368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4865958,0.04671084,0.416588,0.01752605,0.007933539,0.01667294,0.003861406,0.001382355,0.002729126],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6932135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8548557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9608484217637977,"score_gpt":0.6965283431786208,"score_spread":0.2643200785851769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}