{"id":"W2174315796","doi":"10.4141/cjss2012-050","title":"Evaluating the potential contribution of vegetation as a nutrient source in snowmelt runoff","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Snowmelt; Nutrient; Environmental science; Surface runoff; Agronomy; Soil water; Leaching (pedology); Moisture; Phosphorus; Hydrology (agriculture); Chemistry; Environmental chemistry; Soil science; Ecology; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001741042,0.00005696583,0.00009498708,0.000127559,0.0003234319,0.00003638554,0.0003561754,0.00002314965,0.0001911575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003324964,0.00003916209,0.00003105907,0.0004366784,0.0009671313,0.0004231263,0.00004926245,0.0001136254,0.00007136444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002237941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001700774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02689745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01688415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989462,0.00006400971,0.0002531803,0.0001082622,0.0003432367,0.0002850419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994701,0.0000301714,0.0001934228,0.00009009383,0.00006785095,0.0001483286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004024461,0.00006699832,0.5440118,0.00001335361,0.00003145711,0.0000467938,0.009551869,0.3709881,0.03926393,0.001671278,0.001001145,0.03331302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005519137,0.0003228383,0.9618681,0.00004858985,0.0000218001,0.00003437636,0.0008408737,0.02457971,0.002651046,0.008642949,0.0003374417,0.0001003672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957649,0.00008055868,0.0003918581,0.002227233,0.0001846707,0.0001348464,2.060813e-7,0.000001230891,0.001214551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995518,0.000007877486,0.00008372348,0.00026103,0.00001960245,0.000003890984,1.522493e-7,0.000001864809,0.00007004625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4178563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9795825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01072091109806956,"score_gpt":0.2427805873241819,"score_spread":0.2320596762261123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}