{"id":"W2174315796","doi":"10.4141/cjss2012-050","title":"Evaluating the potential contribution of vegetation as a nutrient source in snowmelt runoff","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Snowmelt; Nutrient; Environmental science; Surface runoff; Agronomy; Soil water; Leaching (pedology); Moisture; Phosphorus; Hydrology (agriculture); Chemistry; Environmental chemistry; Soil science; Ecology; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009300901,0.0005220653,0.000534584,0.0007755351,0.0006916634,0.0008969012,0.0006053956,0.0004373315,0.0006007199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008387951,0.0002894781,0.0005683299,0.0008106495,0.0002736342,0.0004844118,0.0003884307,0.0003061181,0.0001256296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003064865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002110837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2350513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3810831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996393,0.00006674742,0.00001844141,0.00004783622,0.0001538862,0.00007382597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995199,0.0001560008,0.00006511974,0.00001555267,0.0001566171,0.00008676991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002898852,0.0004995007,0.7193524,0.000421106,0.0003751711,0.0004653206,0.0003211969,0.02456546,0.2182643,0.0001787386,0.00034319,0.03231475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006177826,0.001279654,0.9115449,0.00002437947,0.0002221098,0.00009039517,0.0004712197,0.05331488,0.03201646,0.0001880412,0.0007602036,0.00002606936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985883,0.0001844721,0.0004596991,0.0000154808,0.000002247618,0.0000456361,0.0002166563,0.000009670513,0.0004778031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997755,0.0002239205,0.001303246,0.00001145121,0.000002179748,0.00001544771,0.0003765222,0.000007163604,0.0003051034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2350513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4673663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01072091109806956,"score_gpt":0.2427805873241819,"score_spread":0.2320596762261123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}