{"id":"W2174855376","doi":"10.1109/tpami.2002.1023808","title":"Detecting binocular half-occlusions: empirical comparisons of five approaches","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence","topic":"Advanced Vision and Imaging","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Computer vision; Computer science; Matching (statistics); Binocular disparity; Binocular vision; Image (mathematics); Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01061615,0.001355272,0.001274255,0.005290365,0.0009665097,0.001747985,0.001872541,0.002319273,0.001290918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04211819,0.0005570204,0.001350925,0.002340452,0.001326116,0.001843901,0.002674798,0.0009406248,0.0005532085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001243867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007364569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005793423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009176345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912725,0.002620723,0.0008145578,0.001979258,0.002858749,0.000454195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9543959,0.0341267,0.003203518,0.003965125,0.00336603,0.0009425623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003219821,0.001323856,0.1177547,0.002869331,0.002205837,0.0003496396,0.00192227,0.08669823,0.01435382,0.003818051,0.006876924,0.7586075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005812537,0.003648607,0.2291104,0.0007910381,0.001907549,0.003599065,0.00278797,0.7076064,0.02867278,0.01042217,0.01042617,0.0004466008],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8287203,0.01162736,0.1465379,0.0003416364,0.0001543248,0.0009723348,0.001946041,0.00177151,0.007928548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8949793,0.001553886,0.09924252,0.0000877975,0.0000524695,0.0001497848,0.002995946,0.0002547466,0.0006835401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01061615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05614424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07130721579069287,"score_gpt":0.3095824787666298,"score_spread":0.2382752629759369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}