{"id":"W2175064082","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01281.x","title":"MATING SYSTEMS, SPERM COMPETITION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BIRDS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":373,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Washington","keywords":"Sexual dimorphism; Biology; Mating system; Sperm competition; Plumage; Zoology; Sexual selection; Mating; Polygyny; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Competition (biology); Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetics; Demography; Genetics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004069776,0.00005793672,0.0001008583,0.00001476309,0.000124112,0.00001322812,0.00005011271,0.00005050179,0.00002707071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003338319,0.00001994343,0.00001647247,0.0002541854,0.0001187317,0.0001039667,0.00002228985,0.00006704439,0.000006337435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009097123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000456584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006632934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006727474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993291,0.0001016036,0.0001872922,0.0001562793,0.0001234732,0.0001022893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997765,0.00003825588,0.00008267488,0.00003696214,0.00004837866,0.0000172667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001519951,0.00009862515,0.4295278,0.00002415362,0.000004730404,0.000001486605,0.0002492742,0.000127743,0.5176064,0.04686504,0.00009827743,0.005244425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002209309,0.00008735453,0.9956191,0.00002513762,0.000009981299,0.00003573037,0.002146661,0.0009589954,0.0000565357,0.0005638636,0.0002173362,0.0000583847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977806,0.000932552,0.00009183874,0.0005115762,0.0001411967,0.000183236,0.000004357011,0.00002584985,0.0003288563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995308,0.00003250877,0.00001064105,0.000003916904,0.0002162224,0.000009311371,0.00001032339,4.801823e-7,0.0001858194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5660913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0155979772301725,"score_gpt":0.2119187182786697,"score_spread":0.1963207410484972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}