{"id":"W2175161454","doi":"10.1139/f2011-085","title":"Maximum likelihood estimation in nonlinear structured fisheries models using survey and catch-at-age data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Likelihood function; Gadus; Maximum likelihood; Stock assessment; Statistics; Estimation theory; Marginal likelihood; Laplace's method; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Monte Carlo method; Restricted maximum likelihood; Quasi-maximum likelihood; Maximum likelihood sequence estimation; Econometrics; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002849531,0.0001323231,0.000255456,0.0002875172,0.0008274232,0.000393624,0.0005829837,0.00006572082,0.00006515002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000372681,0.0001144225,0.00002522206,0.0005581742,0.001796164,0.00152583,0.00006818501,0.0001149775,2.607788e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007743351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008500234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3326985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8827492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983228,0.0002291185,0.0004051716,0.0002531581,0.0003748137,0.0004148863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999045,0.00009343677,0.000259652,0.000183819,0.00006312021,0.0003550179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001322462,0.00001098112,0.9652367,0.00001772591,0.0000219738,0.00006173353,0.02108094,0.00004974605,0.000002594823,0.0003979947,0.0003487659,0.01275758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004223827,0.0001640479,0.88043,0.0001142858,0.00005113208,0.00002803213,0.01743838,0.04621812,0.000007805915,0.05320039,0.001523179,0.0004022765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959429,0.0005683196,0.0006069498,0.0004932396,0.0003956691,0.0001558632,0.00005168774,0.000004587274,0.001780781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850492,0.0002311177,0.0145319,0.0001092325,0.00004384347,8.179948e-7,0.000006361888,0.000006545589,0.00002096053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5500507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6717451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1157642957485246,"score_gpt":0.29617755706191,"score_spread":0.1804132613133854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}