{"id":"W2175167909","doi":"10.3109/10408444.2015.1082973","title":"Illustrative case using the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: prioritization for evaluation of chemicals found in drinking water","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"National Academy of Sciences; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Prioritization; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Computer science; Human health; Hazard; Data mining; Environmental health; Management science; Engineering; Business; Medicine; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003515116,0.001423169,0.0009219064,0.002738972,0.0007662523,0.001465437,0.001542547,0.002510344,0.005154413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003906146,0.0004725287,0.001204351,0.003285852,0.001012967,0.001018664,0.001552688,0.001325633,0.0006995525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001989957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002198276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008934433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01690252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981103,0.001069206,0.0001170661,0.00008568904,0.000543152,0.00007458324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979486,0.001513839,0.0001344252,0.00005366448,0.0003085867,0.00004090205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006761865,0.0006615957,0.003278063,0.02309663,0.0003635192,0.01630547,0.002493426,0.15674,0.01158361,0.2186912,0.06354126,0.502569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003847532,0.001283805,0.006635021,0.008164589,0.0006296203,0.01314796,0.004071661,0.1117877,0.01734841,0.1353982,0.7007188,0.0004294674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.07304859,0.2920159,0.4411737,0.02069142,0.001292481,0.006068453,0.003759865,0.001027469,0.1609221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3464204,0.1532673,0.4701841,0.002455593,0.00025495,0.002403112,0.001141023,0.00007546235,0.02379811],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008934433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01858991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1519806778152573,"score_gpt":0.5343900774052087,"score_spread":0.3824093995899513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}