{"id":"W2175190695","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2015-0065","title":"Development of a cycling data model: City of Vancouver case study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; British Columbia Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Cycling; Visualization; Volume (thermodynamics); Estimation; Quality (philosophy); Data quality; Data mining; Data collection; Data visualization; Transport engineering; Operations research; Statistics; Engineering; Operations management; Geography; Mathematics; Systems engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001526328,0.00006940326,0.0002152752,0.0001575895,0.00006968406,0.00001427499,0.0004084654,0.00003763462,0.00002848667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002090666,0.00006873539,0.00003270992,0.0002003684,0.00004402384,0.0003528025,0.00001598809,0.0001299937,1.030833e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001455966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003297965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02291502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.961352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989643,0.00001742736,0.00047326,0.00008792822,0.0002680594,0.0001890422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988739,0.00002549408,0.000177414,0.0001862871,0.0002318375,0.0005050245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002377262,0.0001988601,0.645043,0.000131414,0.0002647993,0.002216251,0.2107852,0.1369992,0.0001376626,0.00007952485,0.001272079,0.002848201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01341701,0.0008294891,0.1350493,0.002641133,0.001495315,0.0003815322,0.5313981,0.2471057,0.0022852,0.001748853,0.05959399,0.004054489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880396,0.0001744553,0.010673,0.00000989911,0.0003479024,0.00007638186,0.00001193582,0.000004306265,0.0006625228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966742,8.518242e-7,0.003227267,0.000002863978,0.00006731825,3.818273e-7,6.808822e-7,0.00000690734,0.00001951319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.938437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1003488639332002,"score_gpt":0.304607753030057,"score_spread":0.2042588890968568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}