{"id":"W2175190695","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2015-0065","title":"Development of a cycling data model: City of Vancouver case study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; British Columbia Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Cycling; Visualization; Volume (thermodynamics); Estimation; Quality (philosophy); Data quality; Data mining; Data collection; Data visualization; Transport engineering; Operations research; Statistics; Engineering; Operations management; Geography; Mathematics; Systems engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007657245,0.0005855609,0.0004252021,0.001027422,0.001051642,0.001686979,0.001626725,0.001233253,0.002152517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002224595,0.000565294,0.0005045372,0.002305177,0.0004592866,0.000713759,0.000644222,0.0009242944,0.0003594585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006746779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004104916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7252461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7337058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996112,0.0001236952,0.00002235741,0.00008003945,0.0000965531,0.00006612755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990422,0.0003948632,0.00004221867,0.00007825673,0.0003602179,0.00008216759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001172799,0.0003307586,0.04564529,0.0001370492,0.00004593471,0.00100368,0.0004075441,0.9258614,0.0008654218,0.004845458,0.00374648,0.01699363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003558906,0.00004619669,0.01080931,0.00003262417,0.00001944563,0.0000782176,0.0008095491,0.9823157,0.0007522998,0.001042675,0.004026582,0.0000316493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474177,0.0001274695,0.02284544,0.0008292919,0.0000270689,0.0005824507,0.00922766,0.0003626821,0.01858012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962891,0.0001745859,0.02486382,0.00006080642,0.00000786077,0.0003049526,0.005983788,0.00005480608,0.005658525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2747539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5527439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1003488639332002,"score_gpt":0.304607753030057,"score_spread":0.2042588890968568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}