{"id":"W2175528705","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0639:etsotg]2.0.co;2","title":"ESTIMATING THE SIZE OF THE GREATER SNOW GOOSE POPULATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Arctic Goose Joint Venture; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Flock; Population size; Population; Aerial survey; Statistics; Geography; Sampling (signal processing); Snow; Biology; Cartography; Ecology; Mathematics; Demography; Meteorology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005703284,0.0002156145,0.0002521235,0.001128935,0.0004281656,0.0003725958,0.0004192081,0.0002734006,0.001051508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001557455,0.0001811944,0.0002486742,0.0004121087,0.0002622263,0.0005683654,0.0005252713,0.0002485216,0.0002961067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008049365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005563285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05129676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1394325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997378,0.00004913554,0.00001535143,0.00009008942,0.00007793519,0.0000296273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994051,0.0001056065,0.0001825443,0.00005211286,0.0001777357,0.00007681976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008545857,0.00003100848,0.9285257,0.00006841923,0.00008862571,0.0001791694,0.001189547,0.00146442,0.02187349,0.0002594466,0.0007573203,0.0454773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004416479,0.00007037771,0.9941239,0.00001583252,0.00002236969,0.0001828259,0.000221191,0.00256938,0.0009661256,0.0001268306,0.001687128,0.00000974737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928234,0.0002834284,0.004102784,0.00003556197,0.000006307822,0.00006978971,0.0004687339,0.00005123983,0.00215878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990451,0.0002252039,0.007364531,0.00004924996,0.0000111262,0.0001107106,0.001045637,0.0000192247,0.0007233337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05129676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1019964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00942772156084779,"score_gpt":0.2168112883260609,"score_spread":0.2073835667652131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}