{"id":"W2176301239","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01489.x","title":"SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND ADAPTIVE SPECIATION: TWO SIDES OF THE SAME ECOLOGICAL COIN","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assortative mating; Biology; Sexual dimorphism; Genetic algorithm; Disruptive selection; Evolutionary biology; Sexual selection; Ecological speciation; Ecological selection; Ecology; Mating; Incipient speciation; Zoology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Natural selection; Genetic variation; Gene flow; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001390049,0.0003646173,0.0007475897,0.0007755196,0.000611953,0.00273288,0.0008036573,0.001811817,0.002755383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003966982,0.0002724204,0.000645092,0.0009136656,0.005445885,0.004157671,0.002371498,0.002523595,0.0002349507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007112348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007885537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005682608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003662882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993993,0.000271838,0.00003443684,0.0000902386,0.0001265315,0.00007770527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972439,0.0018357,0.0003190172,0.0002317648,0.0001317698,0.0002379083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001009573,0.00005341487,0.006847776,0.0002526975,0.0001002407,0.0003943666,0.000691134,0.01777177,0.003086074,0.9300533,0.001071231,0.03957699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002481869,0.00005193608,0.004310382,0.00008664608,0.00003641656,0.0003836423,0.0002903538,0.02471659,0.0005038873,0.963851,0.005703421,0.00004088685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5631552,0.05115926,0.2424033,0.04959492,0.001125334,0.00006443982,0.0001123891,0.0002831425,0.0921021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780342,0.006931657,0.01072351,0.001603049,0.0003829658,0.00003517794,0.00002470863,0.00003101886,0.002233643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002755383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00921762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009833636353196515,"score_gpt":0.2318039608986563,"score_spread":0.2219703245454598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}