{"id":"W2176637474","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.010","title":"Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosystem Services","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":293,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Seventh Framework Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Incentive; Payment; Payment for ecosystem services; Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Business; Environmental resource management; Best practice; Environmental economics; Economics; Ecosystem; Computer science; Ecology; Finance; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006809967,0.0003809299,0.0004063712,0.002788507,0.001549294,0.002306617,0.0009475843,0.001229687,0.002425456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02646525,0.0002180081,0.0004370591,0.008976813,0.001495722,0.001755132,0.001932223,0.0006797969,0.0001399405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006983195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002686532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07186777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08094709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966084,0.002106643,0.0001922506,0.0001564235,0.000418296,0.0005180915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758431,0.0180673,0.002186087,0.0009021772,0.002171556,0.0008298664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001121732,0.001149786,0.8621308,0.0006605317,0.0003317124,0.004568332,0.01787784,0.01271485,0.0009831983,0.01996225,0.003574078,0.07492486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001532046,0.0004910646,0.8742906,0.0006605741,0.0003124211,0.002013182,0.07751755,0.01355265,0.001183039,0.004205827,0.02555648,0.00006339735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924452,0.0005416726,0.0002062854,0.0003106498,0.000004056524,0.00003549298,0.0001768556,0.000005140364,0.006274785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983397,0.0004282895,0.0003715857,0.00004391439,0.000003776781,0.00004425814,0.0002321025,0.000005784835,0.000530528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07186777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1428989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02606813861057419,"score_gpt":0.2371466616705754,"score_spread":0.2110785230600012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}