{"id":"W2177185598","doi":"10.1109/tap.2015.2487517","title":"A Meander-Line Circular Polarizer Optimized for Oblique Incidence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation","topic":"Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Safe Engineering Services & Technologies (Canada)","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies","keywords":"Polarizer; Oblique case; Optics; Circular polarization; Principal axis theorem; Meander (mathematics); Incidence (geometry); Bandwidth (computing); Physics; Geometry; Microstrip; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001813495,0.0001439947,0.0001710113,0.0001135783,0.00008794013,0.00002997693,0.00006394862,0.0001037194,0.000004096331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002320941,0.0001266022,0.00005298168,0.0001558404,0.00005231183,0.0002333832,7.034939e-7,0.0001534554,0.000005635419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004219313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002192597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008304845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008824521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993593,0.00001513772,0.0001744025,0.0001723341,0.0001041776,0.000174696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996034,0.00003659534,0.00002842069,0.0001432539,0.0001148381,0.00007348874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000415526,0.0001318932,0.00001344419,0.0002443921,0.0001463607,0.000009105483,0.0009033339,0.3839243,0.5364574,0.0007007173,0.0001316131,0.07692198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002655568,0.0004568086,0.00003835128,0.0001219232,0.00009106088,0.00004300298,0.0007738632,0.7345834,0.2548048,0.004709351,0.00124652,0.0004753747],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04697471,0.0004100878,0.9510645,0.0002809472,0.0002855755,0.0004079907,0.00001904339,0.0005117587,0.00004544292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805583,0.000438781,0.01865237,0.0000547405,0.0000176165,0.0001000625,0.000004983368,0.00002524128,0.0001478796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5162687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03766240680078059,"score_gpt":0.2597707227713678,"score_spread":0.2221083159705872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}