{"id":"W2177347169","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115007","title":"A probabilistic analysis of cumulative carbon emissions and long-term planetary warming","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Climate change; Probabilistic logic; Cumulative distribution function; Percentile; Fossil fuel; Range (aeronautics); Global warming; Term (time); Parametric statistics; Atmospheric sciences; Representative Concentration Pathways; Climate model; Climatology; Probability density function; Statistics; Mathematics; Chemistry; Materials science; Geology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007746794,0.0001048165,0.0003216944,0.0005261554,0.00006709084,0.00002432654,0.0001383479,0.00005256203,0.0001853112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001097756,0.0001194329,0.00006569615,0.0002254989,0.0002947653,0.00009903916,0.0001737434,0.0001742991,0.00004566466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002664351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006435625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005032779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006767732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988691,0.00003932224,0.0003493978,0.0003323625,0.00007713121,0.0003327343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992691,0.0001635018,0.0001183513,0.0002434528,0.000003001174,0.0002025852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003978881,0.00009075664,0.9945128,0.00002793916,0.0003021642,0.0000128015,0.002818951,0.0009453011,0.000479914,0.0004328818,0.0001032024,0.0002335255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006321263,0.0001172651,0.9714941,0.00002070847,0.00007032242,0.000004007509,0.0005710984,0.02434214,0.0001733119,0.001916307,0.0003790472,0.0002795261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967991,0.0007540153,0.00001819316,0.0008060795,0.00003693701,0.0001777992,0.0003010212,0.00000609168,0.001100759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992677,0.0002273555,0.00005825545,0.0001314139,0.00004028334,0.0000168394,0.0001276875,0.00001351502,0.0001169267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02339684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4870331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1986184375747269,"score_gpt":0.3264496964476553,"score_spread":0.1278312588729285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}