{"id":"W2177876847","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.057","title":"Uncertainty assessment of source attribution of PM2.5 and its water-soluble organic carbon content using different biomass burning tracers in positive matrix factorization analysis — a case study in Beijing, China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Levoglucosan; Total organic carbon; Environmental chemistry; Biomass burning; Aerosol; Coal combustion products; Environmental science; Biomass (ecology); Pollution; Beijing; Carbon fibers; Chemistry; Inorganic ions; Coal; China; Ion; Geography; Mathematics; Agronomy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008151422,0.0001003158,0.000217735,0.00002572147,0.00008823566,0.0000126136,0.0001533455,0.00002410791,0.00002803212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001811577,0.00005350805,0.00003755681,0.0004276702,0.0002551401,0.00009379483,0.00008584119,0.00007987351,8.625246e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009830816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003781658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007686581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002367544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987892,0.0001264406,0.0002924255,0.000193807,0.0004230613,0.0001750886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995362,0.00003096072,0.000208147,0.0001583667,0.00001445764,0.0000518942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001477343,0.00007196905,0.2282129,0.000005968674,0.0000216993,0.000003592241,0.002617594,0.6059768,0.1630394,5.77978e-7,5.793333e-9,0.0000347297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003445035,0.0001453392,0.6325597,0.00001850302,0.00009067277,0.00001679969,0.005796117,0.3106581,0.0503007,0.000005559382,2.093302e-8,0.00006406631],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993417,0.00005225321,0.0002148927,0.00003308072,0.00003637164,0.0002992014,0.00001045468,0.000001681208,0.00001036913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999939,0.000003241439,0.00002647862,4.36882e-7,0.000003894893,8.20318e-7,0.000004248266,0.000001440352,0.00002040798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4043467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02555399582670974,"score_gpt":0.2448938393478554,"score_spread":0.2193398435211457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}