{"id":"W2178489947","doi":"10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[430:sroamt]2.0.co;2","title":"Species-specific responses of aquatic macrophytes to fish exclusion in a prairie marsh: A manipulative experiment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wetlands","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Exclosure; Macrophyte; Biomass (ecology); Marsh; Ecology; Biology; Wetland; Phragmites; Environmental science; Herbivore","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002589451,0.0001488681,0.0002416713,0.00007727894,0.00005335227,0.00001810149,0.0001706698,0.00005459196,0.000827943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002209833,0.0001306474,0.00004859347,0.0003213912,0.00006007861,0.00006907967,0.0001496438,0.00006905488,0.0001320514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002054794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009543423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001379791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01046873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986871,0.0000834311,0.0003925776,0.0002787681,0.0003172605,0.0002408038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994282,0.0001233691,0.0001134007,0.0002713468,0.000005108151,0.00005854537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004081686,0.0002893949,0.9223985,0.00003542579,0.000009056818,0.00006445478,0.00248165,0.003151232,0.05280367,0.002247624,0.01482872,0.001282102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007721033,0.0003026116,0.9369889,0.0001266885,0.000005060204,0.000008888743,0.0003647336,0.00493275,0.006795224,0.001265523,0.04811577,0.0003217512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789538,0.00003314187,0.001097591,0.000283007,0.000100381,0.0003561256,0.00002686123,0.00001602962,0.01913309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947003,0.000005395832,0.001362566,0.00005616909,0.00006621909,0.00003420523,0.00001888674,0.00001421591,0.003742018],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04600845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9065396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01851135828360592,"score_gpt":0.2401733347379889,"score_spread":0.221661976454383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}