{"id":"W2178661831","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.10.008","title":"An automated learning apparatus for classical conditioning of Lymnaea stagnalis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","topic":"Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Lymnaea stagnalis; Lymnaea; Conditioning; Classical conditioning; Snail; Stimulus (psychology); Neuroscience; Taste aversion; Physics; Biology; Biophysics; Psychology; Mathematics; Ecology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003366056,0.0001438408,0.0004219296,0.0003118655,0.0002524493,0.00005532711,0.0007588922,0.0001047816,0.000008133759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01199351,0.0001125536,0.000138901,0.0006613577,0.0009571773,0.0006749933,0.00007912872,0.0006175485,0.000001773554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003047983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003818021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001391907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.229713e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952253,0.003032362,0.0005916249,0.000358268,0.0003770744,0.0004153347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966826,0.001760892,0.0006523065,0.0002099173,0.0003824384,0.000311802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002575591,0.0001497289,0.0002490468,0.000009321018,0.000001750184,0.00002527137,0.0001553379,0.003212922,0.9939056,0.0009611936,0.0002944256,0.0007778347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000817173,0.005010762,0.002396216,0.00001619148,0.00001407963,0.0004724339,0.0000860271,0.05708261,0.9289505,0.002082637,0.002946009,0.0001253824],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621363,0.00002531994,0.03593149,0.0002461405,0.001163988,0.000167662,0.000010742,0.00006723779,0.0002511031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819715,0.00001615109,0.01719712,0.0005417348,0.0001207447,0.00000623803,7.378198e-7,0.00001537301,0.0001303849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06495513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1924075647097597,"score_gpt":0.5059341012466095,"score_spread":0.3135265365368499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}