{"id":"W2178992915","doi":"10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2597:notert>2.0.co;2","title":"Nonlinearity of the Extratropical Response to Tropical Forcing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Climate","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Forcing (mathematics); Extratropical cyclone; Amplitude; Climatology; Anomaly (physics); Geopotential height; Atmospheric sciences; Diabatic; Geology; Environmental science; Physics; Meteorology; Precipitation; Adiabatic process","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006261835,0.00007046104,0.0001870709,0.00002324896,0.0000728438,0.00001333625,0.0002750724,0.00005048188,0.0001945476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003274661,0.00004348536,0.0001571423,0.0001443604,0.0001081481,0.0001255779,0.0001872633,0.0001968206,0.0000238597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001481147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003451706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002380324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004903732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988303,0.0001031635,0.0004422694,0.00009167056,0.0003423951,0.0001901861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993826,0.0001098755,0.000181748,0.0001947356,0.00002014723,0.0001109401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005369705,0.001030389,0.4122984,0.00004917602,0.00003373676,0.00005217198,0.002351264,0.1883463,0.3846534,0.003438157,0.0002029165,0.002174441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001340252,0.0006367095,0.9778993,0.000109945,0.00004168331,0.000135719,0.0001060531,0.0005999471,0.01091622,0.004416957,0.003668221,0.0001289867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936817,0.000006177901,0.001566505,0.004065784,0.0001550054,0.00008278054,0.000006318347,0.000003575498,0.0004321875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932633,0.00002042468,0.006360667,0.0002885537,0.00004829699,6.206895e-7,5.392124e-8,0.000005256416,0.00001279932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5656009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2130159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01685500356550873,"score_gpt":0.273109803760881,"score_spread":0.2562548001953722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}