{"id":"W2179302700","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1094:gasobb]2.0.co;2","title":"Growth and Sustainability of Black Bears at White River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Population; Mark and recapture; Wildlife refuge; Population growth; Wildlife management; Geography; Vital rates; Ecology; Population size; Demography; Biology; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008691621,0.0001494646,0.0002405772,0.0001277317,0.0001218588,0.00001631372,0.0002207804,0.00007573114,0.0002712795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008392236,0.0001348642,0.00009891389,0.0002510908,0.0004957119,0.0003680485,0.0002644876,0.0001380559,0.000022885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004259863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002931433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000459198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003114518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998146,0.0001091918,0.0006320245,0.0002180322,0.0006708149,0.0002239452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999041,0.00007001603,0.0005571394,0.0001423643,0.0001068055,0.00008273703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001240608,0.0001989351,0.9057004,0.0000648509,0.00006150988,0.00002753608,0.0001137003,0.004332087,0.00001430073,0.003347732,0.08583343,0.0001813917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007924199,0.0001220629,0.9542463,0.00002003552,0.00006360492,0.00001987741,0.0000911009,0.0002233327,0.00001582851,0.01199009,0.0322888,0.0001265903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822565,0.0000236632,0.0007236043,0.008683573,0.0001089636,0.000227281,0.000004291319,0.000008743767,0.007963344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930688,0.00005942064,0.001632189,0.00297337,0.00009476312,0.000004433787,0.000003912001,0.00001031253,0.002152756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05354463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5499601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005718016028254743,"score_gpt":0.2123953825973337,"score_spread":0.206677366569079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}