{"id":"W2179497764","doi":"10.1509/jimk.12.3.86.38099","title":"The Impact of Control on International Joint Venture Performance: A Contingency Approach","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Marketing","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"International joint venture; Control (management); Transaction cost; Joint venture; Joint (building); Business; Contingency; Contingency theory; Database transaction; Marketing; Survey data collection; Industrial organization; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Business administration; Management; Finance; Engineering; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00489796,0.000861716,0.0009742458,0.002764103,0.00145662,0.004342479,0.001141044,0.002102399,0.009830338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01974389,0.0004263399,0.001316071,0.001995431,0.004120772,0.001832127,0.00254939,0.002861262,0.0004099143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003000943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001528407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006128457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004672173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942215,0.002896832,0.0002126182,0.0006670677,0.0009976925,0.001004196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9168626,0.06310797,0.01013016,0.003329547,0.002329482,0.004240246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004970166,0.003190571,0.8318132,0.0003226738,0.002752759,0.001232372,0.001227515,0.03440404,0.002745835,0.07632565,0.002588919,0.0384262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005570716,0.006766703,0.8485556,0.0001835836,0.002445817,0.000373936,0.002648746,0.08446752,0.003542491,0.04644974,0.00374678,0.0002619317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614148,0.0009609127,0.005480003,0.001504504,0.00008445189,0.0001457609,0.000399469,0.00005185913,0.02995825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989678,0.00009384235,0.0002225968,0.00006126761,0.00002825559,0.00002815139,0.00006842924,0.000003869098,0.0005258935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009830338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03288573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01069323320768924,"score_gpt":0.2232754922687953,"score_spread":0.2125822590611061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}