{"id":"W2180539980","doi":"10.1051/e3sconf/20150503001","title":"Hybrid turbulence models for atmospheric flow: A proper comparison with RANS models","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E3S Web of Conferences","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Compute Canada","keywords":"Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations; Turbulence; Planetary boundary layer; Detached eddy simulation; Large eddy simulation; Mechanics; Flow (mathematics); Meteorology; Boundary layer; Turbulence modeling; Environmental science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001083365,0.001012243,0.0007524398,0.0008773783,0.000242334,0.001311417,0.001287965,0.001084845,0.00326058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002104927,0.0003202018,0.0007179425,0.0007334177,0.000365207,0.00201557,0.0008781278,0.0009176593,0.001064086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004015658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002539023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001978882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001098598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994383,0.000159556,0.00003789285,0.00006192244,0.0002724034,0.00002988933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992602,0.0003554304,0.00007665393,0.0001206991,0.0001565653,0.00003047193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004957475,0.0003069219,0.004616556,0.0006520606,0.0001969852,0.0002614165,0.0002146991,0.7401966,0.01451765,0.05282807,0.005312443,0.1804008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002266187,0.0001270493,0.001094052,0.0000578256,0.00001886639,0.00005254271,0.00003122955,0.9855359,0.00124573,0.004924959,0.006858421,0.00003060741],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09755089,0.01624474,0.8567162,0.001493612,0.0008223473,0.0002506203,0.001487734,0.003916411,0.02151754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7321255,0.0121507,0.2434519,0.0002596907,0.0008078683,0.0004023762,0.001633854,0.00119404,0.007974188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00326058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01090771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04417417105838796,"score_gpt":0.2400129277713384,"score_spread":0.1958387567129504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}