{"id":"W2180587500","doi":"10.1674/0003-0031(2002)148[0282:ubbopo]2.0.co;2","title":"Use by Bats of Patches of Residual Trees in Logged Areas of the Boreal Forest","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Midland Naturalist","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Habitat; Foraging; Taiga; Ecology; Myotis lucifugus; Boreal; Residual; Clearcutting; Disturbance (geology); Geography; Forestry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001080481,0.0001338756,0.0001640844,0.0003560961,0.0002754645,0.0003278908,0.0001860607,0.0001454411,0.000531079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000294441,0.0001106639,0.00007661269,0.0001731797,0.0003743341,0.0002139069,0.0002284659,0.0001207185,0.00006674993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003005888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000160071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0430485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2158757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999273,0.00001249828,0.000003186966,0.00002381104,0.00001200041,0.00002116015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998154,0.00002562141,0.00007612622,0.00001340712,0.00002273738,0.00004662521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003557101,0.00006441622,0.973638,0.00002861398,0.00003537755,0.0001968837,0.00134889,0.0001795981,0.01548078,0.00003018929,0.0001184799,0.00852299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001451474,0.00003551287,0.9994372,0.000002627088,0.00000296605,0.00007830701,0.0002770313,0.00005400295,0.00005380134,0.000004155065,0.0000519017,0.000001029392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998267,0.00003208656,0.00001637454,0.000003100828,4.564622e-7,6.436143e-7,0.00002166157,0.000001382292,0.00009757048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996417,0.00002925228,0.00009283897,0.000006915467,0.000001224173,0.000001689151,0.00008342947,6.262425e-7,0.0001424444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0430485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08559585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02411232496961991,"score_gpt":0.2136766505449872,"score_spread":0.1895643255753673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}