{"id":"W2180914215","doi":"10.1007/s10661-015-4985-5","title":"Assessment of public perception and environmental compliance at a pulp and paper facility: a Canadian case study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Business; Mill; Environmental compliance; Livelihood; Natural resource; Pulp mill; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Engineering; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Geography; Political science; Effluent","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004198084,0.000485466,0.0005151127,0.002149342,0.01645566,0.002528075,0.002836532,0.002141884,0.002257032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006741566,0.0005213845,0.0007489288,0.003858977,0.003983322,0.0009513692,0.003156526,0.002610942,0.0001246144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08847904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1170293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941761,0.001015736,0.0001226969,0.0003202513,0.001721392,0.002643781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937229,0.00100613,0.0007155389,0.0002139441,0.002920194,0.001421362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002908356,0.002355494,0.7281397,0.0002309926,0.0001008247,0.006599667,0.2134786,0.0008546238,0.001733778,0.00326847,0.00651516,0.03643181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002735756,0.0004742584,0.4623966,0.0002030529,0.00007829643,0.0009071244,0.5233969,0.001547006,0.0006357753,0.000390341,0.009826863,0.0001164511],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929135,0.0001491139,0.0002122348,0.001240463,0.000009658654,0.0001221244,0.0001713578,0.000004646274,0.005176743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996906,0.0002405359,0.0004882714,0.000257247,0.000004115522,0.00003626753,0.00007316662,0.000004670245,0.001989689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08847904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6419634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09386629745242309,"score_gpt":0.3663082861918373,"score_spread":0.2724419887394142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}