{"id":"W2181330991","doi":"","title":"Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Heart Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Blinding; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; Medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Sample size determination; Comparability; Randomization; Clinical trial; Family medicine; Research design; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine; Quality (philosophy); Statistics; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6706387,0.002620234,0.009970528,0.07271406,0.002349642,0.01139725,0.00502104,0.00471856,0.003977682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9100444,0.002956836,0.009700196,0.05028994,0.008120114,0.01258077,0.008816449,0.004215232,0.001001166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01099084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01922141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002298496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003231565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1373385,0.3181013,0.456626,0.007616012,0.07921862,0.001099651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.02417651,0.64996,0.2274718,0.01870922,0.07813063,0.001551819],"domain_codex":"reporting","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":"reporting","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002996962,0.000267349,0.08712805,0.5654913,0.02380531,0.0002497414,0.008667602,0.0009001571,0.0009514548,0.004839521,0.01742129,0.2872813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003277979,0.004350076,0.1748582,0.5907317,0.03979064,0.002466433,0.008305062,0.003113504,0.003649089,0.02415874,0.1441985,0.001100064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03639927,0.8117449,0.0626748,0.02016918,0.007741314,0.03572439,0.01730724,0.0007856195,0.007453246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3491018,0.2506347,0.2573531,0.01091526,0.004470107,0.1148047,0.0111065,0.000490707,0.001123157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3293613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4061612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9523078254467288,"score_gpt":0.7180600825623046,"score_spread":0.2342477428844242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}