{"id":"W2181422362","doi":"10.1111/jep.12487","title":"The <scp>QATSDD</scp> critical appraisal tool: comments and critiques","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Critical appraisal; Context (archaeology); Management science; Inclusion (mineral); Positivism; Computer science; Process (computing); Qualitative research; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Data science; Epistemology; Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Alternative medicine; Social science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2918062,0.003670728,0.004002125,0.01596475,0.006990944,0.01268385,0.00788411,0.01681475,0.01972574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7790417,0.002245502,0.005827737,0.01719552,0.01572167,0.008146703,0.01125088,0.02559783,0.01337366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01931156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06890176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01190734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5823565,0.2256317,0.09632907,0.004997681,0.08590588,0.004779278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08693411,0.4666135,0.03355772,0.02229633,0.3866121,0.003986139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001323494,0.0000425269,0.0002319983,0.008667053,0.00008467353,0.0002643252,0.006667987,0.0003645582,0.000755433,0.003422953,0.9462779,0.03308806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000337276,0.0001050018,0.001181068,0.03371948,0.0001838918,0.0005296282,0.005054175,0.002289993,0.001813924,0.01160491,0.9428784,0.00030221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002417241,0.005588617,0.05970963,0.7262779,0.1558324,0.02560852,0.004686082,0.003903337,0.0159763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03062754,0.00979395,0.3050385,0.4108838,0.06308717,0.1447716,0.003713541,0.00423464,0.02784915],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7081938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8733291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8143334812263174,"score_gpt":0.8002986505219708,"score_spread":0.01403483070434663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}