{"id":"W2181422362","doi":"10.1111/jep.12487","title":"The <scp>QATSDD</scp> critical appraisal tool: comments and critiques","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Critical appraisal; Context (archaeology); Management science; Inclusion (mineral); Positivism; Computer science; Process (computing); Qualitative research; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Data science; Epistemology; Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Alternative medicine; Social science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1489546,0.0001081385,0.0003238717,0.0001203581,0.0005400419,0.00008305846,0.0002622052,0.0001844252,0.00005629437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8273257,0.00007601195,0.00005758134,0.0003188407,0.0003030794,0.001599243,0.0001386756,0.001787474,0.0001036305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002696732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002893759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006827922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007772681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9751233,0.01851874,0.003721593,0.0002035608,0.001945149,0.000487682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4477507,0.5405399,0.002975243,0.0004119114,0.007490358,0.0008319634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002852697,0.000450069,0.1511941,0.00009026872,0.00005386976,0.00003057866,0.01914935,0.00002527241,0.00001040869,0.01644178,0.7832209,0.02904818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003666858,0.0006559128,0.1254577,0.0001341008,0.00009401421,0.00006305763,0.03267878,0.001841458,0.000001708108,0.01343931,0.8219218,0.00004523501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.550557,0.0006486984,0.003212298,0.4150681,0.0104965,0.001235024,0.0000120105,0.00002500335,0.01874545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096262,0.0008542257,0.01676206,0.07017989,0.002308687,0.0000877756,0.000001596629,0.00002365776,0.0001559099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6783711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8763303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8143334812263174,"score_gpt":0.8002986505219708,"score_spread":0.01403483070434663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}