{"id":"W2181520339","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2010.006","title":"Frequency Analysis as a Tool for Assessing Adverse Conditions During a Massive Fish Kill in the St. Lawrence River, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Environmental science; Climate change; Context (archaeology); Climatology; Period (music); Ecosystem; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Air temperature; Global warming; Atmospheric sciences; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Ecology; Fishery; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004756974,0.0001689045,0.0001549818,0.002117897,0.0006277343,0.0004677289,0.0003365764,0.0002019998,0.001064071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002169004,0.0001125014,0.0001335461,0.001635402,0.000259382,0.0001921916,0.0003492246,0.0002276996,0.0001164858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002470058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001937149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7695703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8754767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996934,0.00004240373,0.00002541853,0.00003446646,0.0001416339,0.00006282802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977763,0.0004035067,0.0006608784,0.00005214795,0.0008312486,0.0002758032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000726881,0.0000166344,0.9911894,0.00001077517,0.00002043921,0.00005222084,0.0002141218,0.0004059392,0.000843533,0.0000276083,0.0002931265,0.00685352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001333094,0.00002175647,0.9982242,0.000002803917,0.000004214653,0.00002293381,0.0003562305,0.001039219,0.0001029519,0.00001128717,0.0002085229,0.000004540481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968144,0.0000800387,0.0006416514,0.00003281732,0.000004453905,0.00002186983,0.000994402,0.00003626969,0.001374132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982526,0.00004392782,0.0007164936,0.000006935062,0.000002991732,0.00001488512,0.0005038326,0.000002804823,0.0004554799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2304297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4635735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04500522828310143,"score_gpt":0.3653001965177085,"score_spread":0.3202949682346071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}