{"id":"W2181520339","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2010.006","title":"Frequency Analysis as a Tool for Assessing Adverse Conditions During a Massive Fish Kill in the St. Lawrence River, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Environmental science; Climate change; Context (archaeology); Climatology; Period (music); Ecosystem; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Air temperature; Global warming; Atmospheric sciences; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Ecology; Fishery; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004402511,0.00009584829,0.0001643283,0.0001281161,0.001507963,0.0001177801,0.0004931108,0.00005205754,0.001842517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000585547,0.00006063725,0.0001013658,0.0004038727,0.0004916887,0.0004566552,0.000248771,0.000839825,0.00002851117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002995156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009027735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1162857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8569331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975034,0.0006396414,0.0003052584,0.0002395134,0.0006957767,0.0006164329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991993,0.0003506303,0.00007333918,0.000228957,0.00006480599,0.00008299127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002791234,0.0001412678,0.9668026,0.00002472691,0.0002906228,0.0002502619,0.003522168,0.0004022717,0.003481914,0.0005719085,0.02442062,0.00006374852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003975349,0.0000231837,0.987115,0.000006337925,0.0000490253,0.00001260669,0.002902756,0.00006047756,0.0002701561,0.007162511,0.001891398,0.0001090193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988415,0.000001523176,0.0000686899,0.009370709,0.0001085677,0.0002865318,0.00003554514,0.000007133067,0.001706305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982395,0.00001354671,0.000332654,0.0006667623,0.00005087941,0.00008500006,0.00001531712,0.000005469199,0.0005909288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7406474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04500522828310143,"score_gpt":0.3653001965177085,"score_spread":0.3202949682346071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}