{"id":"W2181536816","doi":"10.5430/jct.v4n2p96","title":"Underlying Dimensions of the Physical Educators’ Judgments about Inclusion Instrument: Brazilian-Version","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","topic":"Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Scale (ratio); Descriptive statistics; Extant taxon; Portuguese; Variance (accounting); Survey instrument; Physical education; Special education; Inclusion–exclusion principle; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Statistics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007198472,0.0005008206,0.0006433081,0.002692505,0.001233369,0.001100143,0.0006440078,0.0003952433,0.003249398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02489235,0.0004363616,0.0007764243,0.002470379,0.0009769505,0.0008377826,0.002164446,0.0007306628,0.0005918062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001083739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004091573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004431274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00921586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945,0.001557493,0.00122441,0.000332137,0.002047719,0.0003381665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846402,0.005575143,0.003555054,0.0008081539,0.004556867,0.0008646289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002908582,0.0008378678,0.6668307,0.00196645,0.0001133432,0.0002905921,0.03393893,0.0005452869,0.00400005,0.004497761,0.005266956,0.2814213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004800663,0.0003710395,0.9497486,0.001157381,0.00008300973,0.0006090444,0.01186223,0.0008832655,0.001453105,0.002251015,0.03147682,0.00005629687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527667,0.001098729,0.007315482,0.00120768,0.0001381532,0.002119605,0.003715298,0.00009024415,0.03154815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527331,0.001508772,0.03470014,0.0002241693,0.0000495446,0.004269254,0.0031269,0.00004970262,0.003338455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007198472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03806961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03248425894871183,"score_gpt":0.3580760123905185,"score_spread":0.3255917534418067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}