{"id":"W2181536816","doi":"10.5430/jct.v4n2p96","title":"Underlying Dimensions of the Physical Educators’ Judgments about Inclusion Instrument: Brazilian-Version","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Curriculum and Teaching","topic":"Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Scale (ratio); Descriptive statistics; Extant taxon; Portuguese; Variance (accounting); Survey instrument; Physical education; Special education; Inclusion–exclusion principle; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Statistics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001562448,0.00007344738,0.0001667402,0.00006487197,0.00134484,0.00003447635,0.0002162943,0.00005015816,0.00002438747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000520991,0.00004166173,0.0001157322,0.000110156,0.0001713998,0.0002715148,0.0002854364,0.0002945438,0.000001996631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001324077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003894192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005180329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004779528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985828,0.0002687653,0.000289209,0.0000804403,0.0006430155,0.0001358037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991294,0.00006470353,0.00032796,0.0000976142,0.0001638168,0.0002165491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004510504,0.004090951,0.4618215,0.00004446578,0.00005301991,0.000002986314,0.3947808,0.00004954936,0.0009605695,0.0636045,0.01768035,0.05686622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002532799,0.0003666832,0.08451027,0.0009008124,0.0002012387,0.00004806736,0.5082218,0.0004315126,0.0003374029,0.03503255,0.3669553,0.0004615407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845768,0.0001010045,0.00001683613,0.003980538,0.001341551,0.00007893453,8.604491e-7,0.000005544571,0.009897948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990671,0.00004131591,0.0001384083,0.0002532426,0.0002726566,4.221115e-7,5.324414e-7,0.000003541129,0.0002227755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3773113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03248425894871183,"score_gpt":0.3580760123905185,"score_spread":0.3255917534418067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}