{"id":"W2182042100","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2007-0015","title":"A REVIEW OF FORMULAE FOR AVERAGING PHYSICAL QUANTITIES (APPLICATION TO CALCULATION OF THE AVERAGE RADIUS OF TUBES)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tapering; RADIUS; Tube (container); Mechanics; Flow (mathematics); Volume (thermodynamics); Mathematics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000393856,0.0002299019,0.0008349686,0.0001273008,0.00007333849,0.000004262818,0.0004072723,0.0002533808,0.000005376792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000931386,0.0001889385,0.001870791,0.0005819435,0.00002868136,0.00007221733,0.000008872333,0.000284155,1.538056e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004418436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002020353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009326728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007192098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986319,0.0000130889,0.0007684978,0.0001545572,0.0002174102,0.0002145261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987642,0.0003334863,0.0001749457,0.0004473934,0.0002010224,0.00007898808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001031423,0.00008205895,1.87559e-7,0.4343714,0.001370843,4.795038e-8,0.0005993442,0.1608415,0.002713874,0.02416145,0.001534189,0.3743148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003516396,0.00009956187,0.000002374251,0.05420609,0.001919056,0.000008238395,0.00003092376,0.2706651,0.04228556,0.0003804129,0.6294258,0.0006252445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001499415,0.2144257,0.7824817,0.00005405333,0.0002435369,0.002267627,0.0004510558,0.00004661733,0.00001479336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03774768,0.9283516,0.03187679,0.0001366322,0.0001584382,0.001351199,0.0000923819,0.0002322983,0.00005302243],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7506049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7704689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02236602714981026,"score_gpt":0.284966020236266,"score_spread":0.2625999930864558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}