{"id":"W2182321036","doi":"10.26443/msurj.v4i1.74","title":"How taxonomic revisions affect the interpretation of specimen identification in biological field data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; McGill University","keywords":"Taxon; Ecology; Biology; Identification (biology); Taxonomy (biology); Nomenclature; Taxonomic rank; Documentation; Species identification; Geography; Zoology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1792545,0.0009187878,0.0006825663,0.01096846,0.005011806,0.008920063,0.004353287,0.001930949,0.005840722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5341264,0.001244843,0.000677498,0.009159723,0.007822989,0.01096946,0.00656138,0.003073977,0.005095189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004789179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003418645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007494603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01538834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6975403,0.213485,0.03677312,0.01854693,0.03074151,0.002913096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4441784,0.3095897,0.06810313,0.08121128,0.09486498,0.002052517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004380726,0.0001015095,0.06900918,0.002967745,0.0003001969,0.001498282,0.08872164,0.001929375,0.009740746,0.03618469,0.1318188,0.6572898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008189927,0.0001998621,0.1378083,0.007462744,0.0002994391,0.002135641,0.07000902,0.007584702,0.0183459,0.0519393,0.7035996,0.0005336623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3472858,0.01190887,0.3931334,0.07379377,0.04476954,0.003938165,0.007727972,0.003789811,0.1136526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6011541,0.003462509,0.3529656,0.01665371,0.00302383,0.002294922,0.00340253,0.004049015,0.01299375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1792545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9479998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1827072492555904,"score_gpt":0.3713164467252654,"score_spread":0.1886091974696749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}