{"id":"W2182707103","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2005.031","title":"Preliminary Analysis of Pulp and Paper Environmental Effects Monitoring Data to Assess Possible Relationships between the Sublethal Toxicity of Effluent and Effects on Biota in the Field","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Benthos; Biology; Benthic zone; Toxicity; Effluent; Invertebrate; Biota; Daphnia magna; Ecology; Species richness; Toxicology; Environmental science; Chemistry; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001050108,0.0002062321,0.0001602317,0.001041626,0.0002401212,0.0003444308,0.0001474366,0.0001469909,0.0006399025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002545862,0.00007495965,0.0001965163,0.0009893416,0.0001543504,0.0002267615,0.0002063892,0.0002262059,0.00009704079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004022062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005343754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008754384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02173965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999391,0.0001249542,0.00007584092,0.00007414124,0.0002846484,0.00004944192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968761,0.001644973,0.0005574162,0.0001835237,0.000595121,0.0001427437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003842828,0.0002073412,0.9338768,0.00006292406,0.0000623226,0.0002071896,0.0002913449,0.001482068,0.03170388,0.0001487744,0.0003133291,0.03125983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000534784,0.0005118413,0.9914916,0.00000401613,0.00002155486,0.00008464023,0.0001418248,0.001837524,0.005142397,0.00006250909,0.0006929939,0.000003841673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958166,0.00004460954,0.001646496,0.00002100749,0.000001517453,0.00007075741,0.001251092,0.00001750846,0.001130408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992691,0.00007274257,0.003719326,0.0000265218,0.000003129584,0.00006410467,0.002584218,0.000004043315,0.0008349638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008754384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01740682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1836052151388542,"score_gpt":0.4168155715374451,"score_spread":0.2332103563985909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}