{"id":"W2182707103","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2005.031","title":"Preliminary Analysis of Pulp and Paper Environmental Effects Monitoring Data to Assess Possible Relationships between the Sublethal Toxicity of Effluent and Effects on Biota in the Field","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Benthos; Biology; Benthic zone; Toxicity; Effluent; Invertebrate; Biota; Daphnia magna; Ecology; Species richness; Toxicology; Environmental science; Chemistry; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009556026,0.0001223727,0.0002753939,0.0001744001,0.0004684544,0.00004640598,0.0006418374,0.0001393139,0.0001453413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003933835,0.0000678924,0.00005458919,0.0003057583,0.0004427689,0.0002865477,0.0009174855,0.0009845936,0.00001420146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001247774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005497698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007117018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001241149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950662,0.003182044,0.0004059762,0.0003203813,0.0006298661,0.0003955155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947525,0.004517815,0.00008384848,0.000509853,0.000003232334,0.000132777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001735137,0.0002038164,0.8792625,0.00002357938,0.0001236853,0.00000861772,0.001981488,0.0003764654,0.1135904,0.000007216738,0.0001232872,0.00412541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002770337,0.0007721211,0.8551069,0.0000234027,0.00007702032,0.000008460534,0.0003757254,0.00007621392,0.1429577,0.0001378249,0.0001197233,0.00006788817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954722,0.0001087199,0.00002127278,0.003828504,0.00002677917,0.0003994713,0.00001496535,0.000001872885,0.0001262218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993288,0.0001025689,0.0002160143,0.0002131711,0.00006660073,0.0000173117,0.000007887959,0.000006017385,0.00004163174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02936727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4277624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1836052151388542,"score_gpt":0.4168155715374451,"score_spread":0.2332103563985909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}