{"id":"W2182733235","doi":"10.1037/rev0000021","title":"A critical examination of the evidence for sensitivity loss in modern vigilance tasks.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Review","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Response bias; Assertion; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Detection theory; Observer (physics); Social psychology; Computer science; Detector","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002363614,0.0001073823,0.0003089861,0.00003081081,0.00003040995,0.000008772829,0.0001775687,0.00009521052,0.0004106172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006115819,0.00006878575,0.0001318636,0.0002269604,0.0001387559,0.0001165664,0.00003085586,0.0001962722,0.0001220228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004816999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001298635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000571016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009374753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978248,0.0009860984,0.0004891012,0.0003119721,0.0002069698,0.0001810222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979325,0.001196275,0.0001491248,0.000412435,0.0002382392,0.00007140674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006177393,0.002626459,0.01040284,0.003028172,0.00004904905,0.00005433566,0.003017028,0.00002604135,0.0006256934,0.1742517,0.050068,0.7552329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001493606,0.0004295469,0.9329122,0.007993022,0.00006690039,0.0002020984,0.0001459096,0.001572032,0.00004422876,0.01154729,0.04321459,0.0003785956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4773016,0.1567729,0.1230848,0.07671112,0.008683663,0.008565108,0.0001155207,0.0004212112,0.1483441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944232,0.001037451,0.0002987984,0.003703852,0.0000532767,0.0001814185,0.000002155018,0.000006528598,0.0002933352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7321649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3154405963276423,"score_gpt":0.5370851240964145,"score_spread":0.2216445277687722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}