{"id":"W218292613","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0126625","title":"Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Medication Decision-Making in Type 2 Diabetes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Medicine; Type 2 diabetes; Exenatide; Sitagliptin; Computer science; Diabetes mellitus; Operations research; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.119267,0.001331298,0.001336405,0.004631655,0.002862887,0.005076888,0.001737571,0.001199222,0.002581928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2281906,0.0007218065,0.001881708,0.005281707,0.00313548,0.004075708,0.004980296,0.002428874,0.0002298104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005726227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01183474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004666617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00521436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7640154,0.2171828,0.00499652,0.001902407,0.01102255,0.0008804259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7074109,0.2646908,0.009412837,0.006019104,0.01113789,0.001328474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002339039,0.001508372,0.02222895,0.01016119,0.001515924,0.0005688064,0.05044683,0.1015519,0.002665713,0.1297943,0.004718652,0.6725004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001740636,0.00361901,0.01372179,0.006903003,0.0005858361,0.0003953277,0.02388481,0.5779768,0.003640893,0.351099,0.01595396,0.0004789795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1022763,0.001760522,0.872309,0.003499953,0.0002815552,0.007472611,0.0002868358,0.0003039551,0.01180939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2726924,0.0006206181,0.721536,0.000249839,0.00005030997,0.004515702,0.00008651084,0.00002823404,0.000220501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6307516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.616772521204693,"score_gpt":0.442864404589019,"score_spread":0.173908116615674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}