{"id":"W2183309402","doi":"10.1109/antem.2004.7860632","title":"On the limits of validity of the impedance boundary conditions for the analysis of induced currents in solid conductors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Induction Heating and Inverter Technology","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Eddy current; Electrical conductor; Conductor; Electrical impedance; Skin effect; Electromagnetic shielding; Boundary value problem; Electromagnetic field; Curvature; Mechanics; Electromagnetic induction; Physics; Acoustics; Electromagnetic coil; Mathematical analysis; Electrical engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008630708,0.0009186153,0.0009983373,0.001772238,0.001041926,0.003742326,0.001802406,0.002163758,0.002345182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05556287,0.0006261482,0.0009212655,0.0009379105,0.004889258,0.005513189,0.002369228,0.003889469,0.0009279193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008298316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008543224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002437682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001070298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948834,0.002286277,0.0002432793,0.0002237608,0.002149227,0.0002141115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9597176,0.03426819,0.001052829,0.001603017,0.002957106,0.0004014227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000478194,0.0001345209,0.002025008,0.000852777,0.00007798742,0.0009114828,0.001156001,0.3151384,0.02267037,0.5782312,0.003538428,0.07478556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030977,0.00005801019,0.0003086202,0.0002781937,0.00001917031,0.0001760923,0.0001403735,0.778237,0.004594103,0.2115261,0.004588279,0.00004300206],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03885697,0.008691818,0.9201602,0.002989159,0.0003668588,0.0001010164,0.00009590276,0.0003030419,0.02843502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.763059,0.01110159,0.2132475,0.0005949723,0.001208582,0.0003573799,0.0003015965,0.0006281329,0.009501231],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008630708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0456441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07097359863787955,"score_gpt":0.3134950734921152,"score_spread":0.2425214748542356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}