{"id":"W2183634962","doi":"10.2310/8000.2012.110387","title":"Review of the CATCH study: a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Alberta Children's Hospital; Foothills Medical Centre; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Computed tomography; Medicine; Minor (academic); Head (geology); Clinical judgment; Head injury; Clinical decision making; Radiology; Surgery; Medical physics; Intensive care medicine; Humanities","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001735003,0.0001082407,0.0005479181,0.0002572201,0.00005231512,0.000001307394,0.000222411,0.00003401588,0.0002024098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001368471,0.00005033281,0.0001819044,0.0007762521,0.0001344451,0.0001112501,0.000009263895,0.0002575414,3.348933e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003225026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005176053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004347195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004760131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980222,0.0001296883,0.001263479,0.00008569481,0.0002895258,0.0002093994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980806,0.0002278359,0.0006165392,0.0003250182,0.0003923093,0.0003577073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007936843,0.0001064598,0.9292898,0.0001229705,0.0001953936,9.94326e-7,0.0004809817,0.000003409521,0.00001155955,0.000005092676,0.05209059,0.01761339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001561732,0.0008799647,0.9694638,0.004857034,0.0005233074,0.00002823376,0.0001492554,0.00002983372,0.0000161397,0.000007631058,0.0224329,0.00005014261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9368361,0.05621654,0.0002368319,0.004202618,0.00146879,0.001004475,0.00001337171,0.000001220898,0.00002011767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930857,0.004717818,0.0003368017,0.001176768,0.0006347351,0.00000558296,0.000003515765,0.00001394112,0.00002511997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05624968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6571687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1459518926789954,"score_gpt":0.4156141653978065,"score_spread":0.2696622727188112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}