{"id":"W2183651699","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2013-0390","title":"Estimation of salmonid habitat growth potential through measurements of invertebrate food abundance and temperature","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service; Bonneville Power Administration","keywords":"Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Foraging; Environmental science; Benthic zone; River ecosystem; Bioenergetics; Ecology; Trout; Biomass (ecology); Fishery; Rainbow trout; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002712203,0.0003132304,0.0002133141,0.0004659393,0.0002280029,0.0003183763,0.0002338433,0.0001570954,0.0007078943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006857965,0.0002791926,0.0002633001,0.0004331388,0.0001574679,0.0003326683,0.0003334218,0.0001767138,0.0001315147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000385962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003410212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02056151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0563309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998959,0.00002272965,0.00001056047,0.00003591583,0.00002604864,0.000008692743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996669,0.00006628878,0.0001335353,0.0000342742,0.00007015613,0.00002876104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005348398,0.00003036019,0.9743043,0.00002249556,0.00005544275,0.00002196624,0.00008681356,0.006735036,0.01255749,0.00008243506,0.00009477085,0.005955401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005416952,0.00007126954,0.9605772,0.0000072332,0.00001922415,0.00003708231,0.0001155746,0.03667275,0.002172465,0.0001059691,0.0002058119,0.00001007579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930974,0.00003020911,0.005548745,0.00001037932,9.957724e-7,0.00001813916,0.0005816987,0.00003192317,0.0006805658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940982,0.00004043734,0.004906973,0.000004467972,8.789707e-7,0.00003525814,0.0006283181,0.000007372556,0.0002781223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02056151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04088366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01493228158459274,"score_gpt":0.1973852873094992,"score_spread":0.1824530057249065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}