{"id":"W2183894901","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2012-0462","title":"Strong anthropogenic signals in historic forest fire regime: a detailed spatiotemporal case study from south-central Norway","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scots pine; Taiga; Fire regime; Boreal; Range (aeronautics); Fire ecology; Fire history; Environmental science; Disturbance (geology); Geography; Slash (logging); Forestry; Physical geography; Population; Ecology; Climate change; Ecosystem; Pinus <genus>; Archaeology; Geology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004008405,0.0001781947,0.0002284779,0.0007194442,0.0004447828,0.0005746419,0.0003725583,0.000259079,0.0005641652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006347328,0.0001674211,0.0002933597,0.001205606,0.000501922,0.0002848122,0.0004713228,0.0001584968,0.00007185533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001469643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008964579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3825977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6101378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997718,0.00004068733,0.00002159219,0.00006426087,0.00003216792,0.00006954276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995461,0.0001231299,0.0001679294,0.00004496413,0.00006055653,0.00005740468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006496546,0.00006182016,0.9857453,0.00004874806,0.000074028,0.003546309,0.003587518,0.001250347,0.001151358,0.0001116912,0.000302463,0.004055495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002804604,0.00002021292,0.9949815,0.00001955208,0.00002088667,0.0004146317,0.002987142,0.000799156,0.00008406123,0.00002479143,0.0006364398,0.000008978398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992225,0.00008170261,0.0000849034,0.00001076039,0.000001390405,0.000005671538,0.0003578062,0.000001529657,0.0002335531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998971,0.0001365283,0.0002326006,0.000007448935,0.000002148403,0.000006890847,0.0005185843,0.000002167175,0.0001226367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3825977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7607416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03223917770312325,"score_gpt":0.2806383788492648,"score_spread":0.2483992011461415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}