{"id":"W2184387695","doi":"10.1017/s1481803500008654","title":"Systematic reviews in emergency medicine: Part II. Critical appraisal of review quality, data synthesis and result interpretation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital; Capital District Health Authority; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Readability; Interpretation (philosophy); Resource (disambiguation); Quality (philosophy); Medicine; Narrative; Medical literature; Management science; Data science; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Epistemology; Pathology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4397637,0.005606029,0.02298847,0.03043087,0.003400719,0.01004276,0.00636569,0.008338972,0.004885201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7003622,0.0062221,0.01291009,0.01844212,0.008091942,0.007816547,0.005914245,0.007748964,0.001337311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01299087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04171375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004457427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008467178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4278783,0.4172812,0.1076289,0.00595191,0.03973662,0.001523084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2210147,0.6503981,0.07312142,0.01293971,0.04062188,0.001904242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001335498,0.0001926708,0.002984723,0.7234256,0.01490129,0.0002286872,0.00207109,0.001154794,0.001484396,0.004042379,0.03259272,0.2155861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003829157,0.002889081,0.01738967,0.7497503,0.05879237,0.001851482,0.002190684,0.005780978,0.005664986,0.03740661,0.11372,0.0007347225],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000976511,0.9534725,0.01730529,0.01212406,0.005083518,0.00973104,0.0005190588,0.0000903228,0.0006977335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03226208,0.7826217,0.1125741,0.009499122,0.01081476,0.05012207,0.001050761,0.0002067608,0.0008487037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5602363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6908712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8057648397654101,"score_gpt":0.6039481953855843,"score_spread":0.2018166443798258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}