{"id":"W2184474092","doi":"10.12957/childphilo.2015.20707","title":"Uncovering the Efficacy of Philosophical Inquiry with Children","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Philosophy for Children; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophical methodology; Critical thinking; Sociology; Philosophical theory; Philosophical analysis; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medicine; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0332351,0.0007406436,0.0008906854,0.004395246,0.00764136,0.0148817,0.002522232,0.00330541,0.005711662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08457007,0.0009044162,0.0006482271,0.002952337,0.06294587,0.01764785,0.01887501,0.00564459,0.0005284451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01082639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007801558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005445062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005112191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9537795,0.03776433,0.0009618436,0.002832775,0.003211015,0.001450548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8655189,0.1146003,0.008136773,0.006941443,0.003361158,0.001441424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004888288,0.00003840595,0.008512355,0.0003401604,0.00002207791,0.000247454,0.6477116,0.0002171016,0.0004997133,0.3320807,0.0005648112,0.009716582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008069484,0.00009549833,0.01102094,0.001460737,0.00007838954,0.0008158436,0.581598,0.001511528,0.002570379,0.2788054,0.1218736,0.00008908616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6093142,0.004932031,0.05477092,0.01794525,0.0002402094,0.0003707434,0.0001678597,0.0001215012,0.3121373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896408,0.0007195687,0.005283597,0.0005260131,0.00002878069,0.0002239341,0.00002564288,0.00004909216,0.003502628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0332351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1757661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04504244154164314,"score_gpt":0.2966126796518774,"score_spread":0.2515702381102343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}