{"id":"W2184658618","doi":"","title":"Economic Analysis in Environmental Reviews of Trade Agreements: Assessing the North American Experience","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Government (linguistics); Political science; European commission; Regional science; International trade; Geography; Business; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06746519,0.0002494641,0.0008714761,0.007644014,0.006608312,0.0129518,0.001390402,0.003375858,0.004354248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1393974,0.0005532351,0.0004479736,0.01941965,0.007276491,0.01125525,0.003743524,0.002467846,0.0003051353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01973082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01799505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0530682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1161632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9270802,0.05706602,0.002123969,0.002145514,0.009333386,0.002250955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6803369,0.247581,0.018615,0.005936326,0.0428335,0.004697331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003147458,0.0002725692,0.05404751,0.001853699,0.0001947766,0.000902438,0.1409155,0.003198752,0.0003573467,0.4831746,0.08137573,0.2333923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006855321,0.0001893452,0.09121158,0.003076386,0.000121168,0.0003503937,0.088999,0.002126482,0.000598965,0.0783901,0.734734,0.0001340172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3894486,0.1893929,0.004972821,0.1889659,0.0009902078,0.0001882162,0.0003981787,0.00006144615,0.2255817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240212,0.05191647,0.002878052,0.007442047,0.0008591194,0.0001851878,0.0001905863,0.00005124073,0.01245621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9469318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3567943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08775161614975407,"score_gpt":0.3152761426964575,"score_spread":0.2275245265467034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}